Nature VS. War
Since the beginning, people have modified nature, the environment to live well. First was fire, then metal, palaces, now are towers and nuclear bombs. Technology changed man’s life in a major way, radically.
Things are a lot more easier now, thanks or because of this technology, but doesn’t that makes us less humans? Anyway, that’s another thing to talk about.
Back to the point: many say that a lotta animals are danger species, well they not, MAN is a danger specie. Doesn’t it hurt your eyes to see people going wild with bullet proof vests, helmets and boots?
Directors, owners of companies, The Gov take decisions like:
“Oh, look at this forrest, let’s cut it and build a hotel in the middle, in 3 years there will be a highway next, so we better hurry.”
“Check these leopards, we could sell some coats with 700$, bring the snipers!”
“We have to expand our boundries, let’s build amusement parks next to bears, that way people will come to watch’em and we shall become milionares with our honey flavor popcorn bussiness.”
Have you ever watched the sky at night, wondering how the world was 5000 years ago, and how it will be in 100 years from now?
We can’t stop nature’s force(you already seen whatit can do, tsunamies, earthquakes, climateric changes,etc.) but WE CAN stop war.
That way we’ll be afraid only of one thing, and that is out of our hands, but war, damn, that can be stopped “easily”(comparing to the darkside of nature),we just have to become humans, yeah that’s right, we “reached” a point when we have to become humans again.
What it would be, a catastrofal change once on 500 years(because of nature) or one in 10 years that’s gonna lay a print forever ?(Hiroshima, Nagasaki)
Tell GreenPeace I said “Hi”
We can still choose!
WTC
I’m tired now..but part 2 won’t be that short!